NordicGore schrieb am 03.12.2022 09:39:
"dann hat Boris Johnson im Auftrag der USA gesagt, Selenskyj, du darfst keinen Frieden schließen"
schauen wir mal was die financial times schreibt:
https://www.ft.com/content/7b341e46-d375-4817-be67-802b7fa77ef1
das war der status des deals kurz vor dem besuch von boris johnson:
Ukraine would maintain its armed forces but would be obliged to stay outside military alliances such as Nato and refrain from hosting foreign military bases on its territory.
Putin’s press secretary Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Wednesday that neutrality for Ukraine based on the status of Austria or Sweden was a possibility.
“This option is really being discussed now, and is one that can be considered neutral,” said Peskov.
Sergei Lavrov, Russia’s foreign minister, said that “absolutely specific wordings” were “close to being agreed” in the negotiations.
danach
https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/articles/2022/05/5/7344096/
Johnson’s position was that the collective West, which back in February had suggested Zelenskyy should surrender and flee, now felt that Putin was not really as powerful as they had previously imagined.
Moreover, there is a chance to "press" him. And the West wants to use it.
Three days after Johnson, now the happy owner of a Vasylkiv rooster, flew back to foggy Albion, Putin went public and said talks with Ukraine "had reached a dead end".
Aber warscheinlich wirst du jetzt sagen das die financial times und die ukrainische prava russische propaganda verbreiten.
